ad

Wheelchair user left stranded by Flintshire Council travel cut

Published date: 07 February 2012 |
Published by: Lois Hough


 

A WHEELCHAIR user has been forced to give up his two beloved jobs because his free transport was axed.

Flintshire Council revoked the free transport concession for Michael Evans, 37, who has Down syndrome, following a review of his benefit entitlement.

His concerned parents Sue, and Norman, both 67, who live with their son on Wrexham Road, Mold, lodged an appeal against the decision but have since learned they were unsuccessful.

Michael, who travelled by taxi to work placement schemes at Abbey Metal, Flint, and at the County Hall canteen, Mold, has now had to give up his jobs.

Sue said: “Michael is really sad about it.

“He absolutely loved his jobs but now he spends his days watching DVDs.

“The other day he brought me his £6 wages and asked whether that would pay for his taxi.”

Council bosses revoked Michael’s free transport following an assessment of his Disability Living Allowance.

Of this allowance, Michael receives £51.40 per week to cover the cost of his transport needs. But the cost of taxis to and from work totalled £82 per week.

The couple had originally planned to drive Michael, a wheelchair user who can’t walk very far, to work but Sue, who suffers arthritis, and Norman, who has undergone heart surgery, decided they could not risk their health.

“Perhaps if it was for the short term we may have been able to take him but we just can’t face it,” said Sue.

“We’re at retirement age now. We should be winding down not racing round.

“The council want to teach Michael how to use public transport but I think that’s a stupid idea.

“To expect someone as vulnerable as Michael to use public transport, when he does not have the mental capacity to even cross a road, is beyond belief.”

A spokesman for Flintshire Council said: “Flintshire Council have fully considered Michael Evans’ situation and have no further comment to make.”

The couple have now written to Delyn MP David Hanson seeking his support.

You must be a registered user to leave a comment. Register or login here.

  1. Posted by: cynprifathro at 13:14 on 07 February 2012 Report

    A very sad though not unsurprising story of how the most vulnerable members of our society can be among those most affected by local authority cuts. The salaries of the overpaid Chief Executive and his fellow council 'bosses', many of whom have been promoted to undue levels of incompetence, need to be drastically lowered as a matter of urgency. This financial saving could then be utilised to protect the most deserving cases.

  2. Posted by: mr katt at 16:51 on 07 February 2012 Report

    SHAME SHAME on FLINTSHIRE COUNCIL SURE hope that the TV news uses this by-line Election time will tell ....

  3. Posted by: griffo at 17:53 on 07 February 2012 Report

    why do the council get things so very wrong?Michael and his parents have been treated disgracefully.

  4. Posted by: InMyOpinion at 18:16 on 07 February 2012 Report

    Council bosses revoked Michael’s free transport following an assessment of his Disability Living Allowance... where those who did the assessment medically qualified?... so often decisions are made by people in councils who do not even have a first aider qualifications... usually managers who are being ordered to save any money regardless of there conditions... and who have zero understanding of this type of severe disability.

  5. Posted by: nikkijl at 18:29 on 07 February 2012 Report

    Taking away Michaels benefit for transportation to and from his work is taking his independence Time and time I read of greedy councilmen, people on welfare/benefits abusing the system, living lavish lifestyles while living off the government taking away from the people who genuinely need the help. Michael is giving back to society by having two jobs, a lot more than I can say for some people out there, come on councilman time to wake up you are doing good decent people an unjust

  6. Posted by: griffo at 18:55 on 07 February 2012 Report

    i totally agree with nikkijil.I would fight this all the way.Im sure michael would have a lot of support.unlike the council for making such a decision.

  7. Posted by: alidyl73 at 19:06 on 07 February 2012 Report

    Time and again we read stories of how the most vulnerable people in the community suffer at the hands of this wasteful council. Millions will be thrown at the Ombudsmans Hearing for Cllr. Heesom, while good people like Michael are struggling. Shame on you FCC!!!!

  8. Posted by: liberty1 at 19:32 on 07 February 2012 Report

    All the people who have posted so far have made good and valid points but this type of thing will be in the press more and more over the coming months/years.

  9. Posted by: Y FFin at 22:01 on 07 February 2012 Report

    Unless UK plc including Wales plc starts making more money, then we will find it increasingly difficult to support the most vulnerable in society. Perhaps there are charities out there who will step in to fill the funding gap?

  10. Posted by: simples at 08:20 on 08 February 2012 Report

    I hope the cretin who is responsible for this decision can sleep at night. But then again they probably do as they clearly don't have a conscience. Flintshire Council should be ashamed, the amount of over-paid inflated egos making decisions like this is a disgrace.

  11. Posted by: Roland Cleth at 08:30 on 08 February 2012 Report

    Mr. & Mrs. Evans, understandably, make the point that, at their age, they should be "winding down". Taking this further, given their ages, what will happen to Michael in the future? Should they not be making plans for his future care. Surely, some form of assistance from the Council, such as how to use public transport can only be a good thing. Yes, of course, Michael is vulnerable; however, wouldn't it be great to see if he, like many others in such a sad situation, can realise his potential.

  12. Posted by: daisymay at 08:45 on 08 February 2012 Report

    As Michael lives in Mold couldn't he continue to work at the County Hall in Mold. If his parents are still able to drive that shouldn't be too strenuous. It seems a shame that he should lose both jobs. Quality of life should come into the equation somewhere.

  13. Posted by: Hen ddraig at 12:29 on 08 February 2012 Report

    IMO... Disability living allowance mobility component is set by central government not by local authorities and Michael has been receiving the maximum rate allowed by Westminster. Flintshire might however have been able to negotiate a better Taxi rate fro a fixed contract of 3 days a week to Flint and 2 days a week to shire hall.

  14. Posted by: liberty1 at 19:52 on 08 February 2012 Report

    YFF, we do make money, lots of it which pays for us to be in Afgan, give aid to places such as India which has a space prog, nuclear weapons/subs and has more billionaires than the UK, give hundreds of millions to Libya to fight a war etc etc, yes we will hear more of these stories in the coming months/years.

  15. Posted by: griffo at 19:59 on 08 February 2012 Report

    Support workers are put in place to help vulnerable people.......but there not free either.So why not fund a taxi????

  16. Posted by: JonJohn at 21:43 on 08 February 2012 Report

    Hen ddraig Disability living allowance mobility component is set by central government not by local authorities.... yes but DLA is based on an assessment from doctors and specialists... in this case it seems not or the doctor doing the assessment is either stupid or under orders to cut the numbers... as has been seen a lot recently... again making the worse off pay beyond there means.

  17. Posted by: Hen ddraig at 23:56 on 08 February 2012 Report

    JonJohn... Which part of " Michael has been receiving the maximum rate allowed by Westminster" did you not understand? The max rate for the mobility component is £51.40 and this is insufficient to cover his Taxi costs.

  18. Posted by: REDQUAYITE at 23:57 on 08 February 2012 Report

    The Tories, Lib Dem's and so called Independent Cllrs supposedly in charge of the Council should be ashamed of this story. At the same time they squander over £3million on consultants. Time to kick the current regime out in May.

  19. Posted by: KenHolmes at 15:50 on 09 February 2012 Report

    IMO/JonJohn/Hen ddraig, I used to work for Wrexham council and as far as I know, the assessment is to see if the claimant has enough points (from 1-10) to enable funding for transport, the assessment is supposed to look at 1. severity of the disability, 2.need to travel, 3. eligibility. and reports from a social worker/care worker. no other information is looked at. no medical is asked for or required. no medical records are used. the claimants DLA is not affected, unless a fraud is detected.

  20. Posted by: SG2012 at 17:16 on 09 February 2012 Report

    This article has really upset me aswell as making me feel so angry. FCC are disgusting for taking this away from Michael. He is trying to lead a normal lifestyle and fair play to him for working 2 jobs that he loved doing. There are so many people out there who don't work and have no ambition to work just live on benefits all their lives.. I think Michael and his family should fight this all the way.

  21. Posted by: KenHolmes at 19:32 on 09 February 2012 Report

    I forgot to say that I agree with most of the comments on this, There are others less deserving who this could have been taken from without picking on a person like Michael who's condition relies on transport, the problem is the person doing the assessment had no thought about the person, just the amount to be saved, orders from higher management etc etc.

Featured Businesses

View all adverts